Criminal law – Murder – Self-defence – Provocation – Evidence – Relationship evidence – Admissibility – Admissible on question of intent – Not admissible as propensity evidence – Expert evidence – Evidence that knife wounds were self-inflicted – Whether a matter for expert evidence – Whether witnesses certified as specialists – Evidence shown to have no proper foundation after being admitted – Trial judge’s refusal to withdraw evidence from jury – Conflict in expert evidence – Jury must be satisfied beyond reasonable doubt of the correctness of the preferred evidence: R v ANDERSON, COURT OF APPEAL | Anti Cyber Forensics - The Art of Counter-Cyber Forensics
anticyberforensics.wordpress.com
About: R v ANDERSON (2000) 1 VR 1 (c) 1998 Reed International Books Australia Pty Limited trading as Butterworths VICTORIAN REPORTED JUDGMENTS R v ANDERSON COURT OF APPEAL (2000) 1 VR 1 5 August 1999; 25 February 2000 25 February 2000 CATCHWORDS: Criminal law - Murder - Self-defence - Provocation - Evidence - Relationship evidence -…
